[Content Note: hostility to agency]
I’m reading the recent interview with Jennifer Roback Morse in the National Catholic register and I just have to shake my head.
Let’s go over some of the more…interesting statements.
When asked about the injuries caused by the sexual revolution:
Contraception is an expected part of a woman’s career path. So that means the whole system is built around women treating their bodies as if they were men’s bodies.
So wait a second, using contraception and terminating an unwanted pregnancy amounts to “women treating their bodies as if they were men’s bodies”? So the only thing that makes women’s bodies different from men’s bodies is that the former can be used as a baby-incubator? I find Morse’s depiction of womanhood and women’s bodies unfortunate and horribly dismal.
In defending her insistence that the sexual revolution is a totalitarian movement:
So the government has to step in and control people’s behavior and even people’s thoughts about what’s possible, desirable and realistic. The HHS mandate is just one example of the government stifling dissent by essentially saying: “This society will be built around contraception, and there will be no dissent from that.” That’s one example of totalitarianism coming straight from the government and literally shutting down people who disagree.
Here’s the thing: No one is being forced to use contraception. The government is saying all people should be allowed and able to use contraception if they so choose. That’s a signifcant difference from the strawman that Morse is erecting here. Indeed, it is Morse and those like who are insisting that those who disagree with their position should be forced to comply with their view of the world.
while listing the “victims” of the sexual revolution:
Consider, for example, people who’d like to stay married but their spouse wants a divorce, so that’s the end of it. The government takes sides with the party who wants the marriage the least.
Would she actually prefer that the government coerce someone to remain with a spouse or partner they do not love and do not wish to be around anymore? Talk about totalitarianism.
But wait, it gets better:
We all know somebody in this category — the jilted wife or the husband who’s kicked out of the family because his wife didn’t want to be bothered with him anymore, and now the courts are making him pay child support for kids he doesn’t see.
Reread that last clause a few times. Here we have Jennifer Roback Morse — who spends a great deal of time talking about the importance of marriage and families to care for children — now talking about men being “forced” to help support the children he helped bring into this world. Apparently, men should only be held responsible for the children they bring into the world if “they’re allowed to see them”? Doesn’t sound like a very “pro-children” position to me.
On “heartbroken career women”:
These women are also all around us, but we simply don’t see them. [Culture says] the entry fee into the professions for women is that you chemically neuter yourself during your peak childbearing years in your 20s — and if you have an “accident,” you get an abortion.
Exactly what “culture” tells women that the price for them having a career is not having children? There are organizations that advance and push for legislation to protect pregnant women in the workplace. You know who doesn’t support that legislation? The so-called “pro-life” crowd. People who insist that for women, having a career and a family are incompatible. In short, people like Jennifer Roback Morse. So the fact that she an those like her push this “career or family” dichotomy, then have the audacity to feign pity for those women who feel like they’re stuck with that dichotomy is contemptible.
On the men and women who are “victimized” by the sexual revolution by “the lack of suitable mates”:
Absolutely. And I hear it from men, too [about not finding suitable wives]. Our whole culture is so sexualized it’s hard to find a suitable mate. Many young people have told me they wish the Church would do more to facilitate young adults meeting each other in a faith environment, where people won’t always be coming onto you.
I don’t know, maybe part of the problem here is that people are looking at other people as “potential mates” rather than people to get to know. This whole thing makes finding a mate sound like a mission that erases real interpersonal relationships. That’s something Morse listed as a problem earlier in the interview.
(h/t Right Wing Watch)