A while back, Wendy told me about a synchroblog that New Direction and the BTG Project are sponsoring on June 24. The press release for the event describes the event as follows:
New Direction has been seeking to foster safe and generous space for authentic conversation about faith and sexuality. We have committed ourselves to building bridges. But we cannot do it alone. We need other Christ-followers: gay and straight and everything in between, to speak up and join the conversation, to share the heart of the gospel in the midst of this conflict. We need those beyond the walls of the church: gay and straight and everything in between, to speak up and join the conversation, to share their thoughts on how the church can reach across the divide and build bridges.
In light of her desire to get people of all walks of life to join in the conversation, Wendy has asked me to participate in this synchroblog. As a friend and someone who believes that this dialogue is an important one, I have graciously (at least I hope I've been gracious about it) accepted her invitation. I would like to invite any of my other readers -- regardless of sexual orientation or religious persuasion -- to also participate in this event. It's only through the addition of a multitude of voices that a real dialogue -- or rather a harmony of related dialogues -- can emerge.
Some may wonder why I would choose to participate in such a dialogue or encourage others to do so. After all, they reason, it's clear why Christians would wish to engage in this dialogue in order to gain converts -- though I personally do not believe that's the only reason Christians choose to enter into this dialogue. But what possible reason could a non-Christian -- especially one who has been hurt by Christians in the past -- have for entering into such a dialogue? What do I hope to gain from it?
Surprisingly, the question contains its own answer. I choose to participate in this conversation because I've been hurt by Christians in the past. To me, reconciliation is an important part of the healing process. Conversing with Christians -- even Christians who theology and sexual ethics differ greatly for my own -- gives me another opportunity to make peace with my past. It gives me the chance to realize that while I've been hurt in the past, other Christians really are decent and loving. It also allows me to regain the love and dignity that was stolen from me by those past experiences.
Participating in such a dialogue also gives me the opportunity to tell my story and serve as a representative for all those others who still might be hurt by some Christians. It enables me to raise some Christians' awareness of just how little it takes to create great pain for young people struggling with a sexual orientation that their friends, family, and church says is bad. If offering my story will help one Christian better reach out to and support another gay person when they desperately need it, then my participation in this dialogue is well worth it.
Finally, I choose to participate in such a dialogue because in the end, it is in my best interests to do so. To be honest, there are many Christians -- including Christians who believe that people should not get involved in same-sex romantic relationships -- that are in my life. These people are my friends, my coworkers, and my family members. They are not going to change their beliefs any time soon, nor are they going to disappear from my life anytime soon. So I can either choose to live a life where we are distant from one another and suspicious of each other. Or I can choose to enter into dialogue in an attempt to find mutual understanding and a better sense of peace despite our differences.
To me, the choice is obvious.
(The images in this post were provided by Wendy Gritter and used with her express permission.)


I'm glad you're participating, Jarred. I have friends who are involved with BTG and I am supportive of what they are doing. I still don't know if I'll chime in or not...it's so sensitive an issue that I worry about being able to tread lightly enough. I'll have to think on it.
Thank you Jarred for sharing this with your readers and for articulating so well your reasons for wanting to participate. I'm thrilled that your voice will be part of the conversation that emerges on June 24th. I'd also just extend my personal invitation to any readers here to also consider joining the conversation.
Thanks, Erin. I'm happy to be participating, too. And I still do hope that you consider contributing to the event. I totally understand your concerns about how sensitive this issue is. But then again, I think that's all the more reason we need to address it. Part of the dialogue is probably going to involve hitting tender nerves and possibly even reopening old wounds. But one thing that my life has taught me is that these things are often a necessary part of the healing process. And I know that you have such a kind heart that you'd be more than willing to work through anything that came up as a result of your participation. This event needs more people with the kind of compassion I know you to have.
And thank you, Wendy, for giving me such a perfect opportunity to engage in such a dialogue. I hope that some of my readers join us for the synchroblog as well.
And I am glad you do participate. It does you credit. While we may not always agree no one has the right to take away your dignity or your voice.
Thanks, Matt. I'm looking forward to the conversations I hope will continue from this event.
This sounds like a worthwhile exercise, but I was a bit suspicious about the "sharing the heart of the gospel" bit.
To me, the heart of the message (which can be found in all religions) is love and compassion. Christians need to remove the beam from their own eyes before trying to remove the mote from other people's eyes - but perhaps that is what this exercise is all about. I hope so.
It's hard to say what will come from this dialogue Yewtree. But one think I've learned is that the only way to find out is to give it a try. And by participating, I hope to some influence on where the dialogue takes us.